This was extracted (@ 2025-02-19 17:10) from a list of minutes
which have been approved by the Board.
Please Note
The Board typically approves the minutes of the previous meeting at the
beginning of every Board meeting; therefore, the list below does not
normally contain details from the minutes of the most recent Board meeting.
WARNING: these pages may omit some original contents of the minutes.
Meeting times vary, the exact schedule is available to ASF Members and Officers, search for "calendar" in the Foundation's private index page (svn:foundation/private-index.html).
A. Prepare a notice for the members regarding the bylaws
amendment approved in October so that the formal approval
clock can commence.
B. Find a way to make use of our github repo to assist with
collaborative writing of ASF documentation and provide a
place for meaningful tracking of board issues.
C. Work on a binary release policy.
@Matt: find out about updating bylaws for a DE corp
A. Prepare a notice for the members regarding the bylaws
amendment approved in October so that the formal approval
clock can commence.
B. Find a way to make use of our github repo to assist with
collaborative writing of ASF documentation and provide a
place for meaningful tracking of board issues.
C. Work on a binary release policy.
@Bertrand: take over the GitHub repo ASF docs repo initiative
@Roy: get last CoI signature @Roy: notify members about bylaw updates
A. Conflict of Interest affirmations are not complete for 2020. @Roy: remind CoI slackers that affirmation is an ASF requirement
A. Clarify guidelines for PMCs to publish binary artifacts
B. Clarify guidelines for PMCs to request Continuous Integration resources
C. Follow up on member vote to update Bylaws to change
gender-specific terms.
A. Clarify guidelines for PMCs to publish binary artifacts
B. Clarify guidelines for PMCs to request Continuous Integration resources
C. Follow up on member vote to update Bylaws to change
gender-specific terms.
@Craig: prepare a board resolution for bylaw changes
A. Clarify guidelines for PMCs to publish binary artifacts
B. Clarify guidelines for PMCs to request Continuous Integration resources
C. Determine how directors and officers register their annual
Conflict of Interest statements
A. Clarify guidelines for PMCs to publish binary artifacts @Roy: start working on binary release policy B. Clarify guidelines for PMCs to request Continuous Integration resources C. Determine how directors and officers register their annual Conflict of Interest statements @Craig: start working with Matt and Sam to create a CoI form and process
Clarify guidelines for PMCs to publish binary artifacts Clarify guidelines for PMCs to request Continuous Integration resources Determine how to accept Restricted Donations https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/ASFP/issues/ASFP-2
Clarify guidelines for PMCs to publish binary artifacts Clarify guidelines for PMCs to request Continuous Integration resources Determine how to accept Restricted Donations
* [Treasurer] list of donor contact information for thank-you letters. Jim notes that this is the Fund-raising report.
Deferred.
Deferred discussing dissolving audit committee to the board mailing list.
Discussion of the need to approve the expense of a GAAP review. This was tabled to the board@ mailing list.
Henning to try to pursue "Apache Attic"
Tabled due to time constraints.
A. Apache Geronimo project
There was continued significant discussion on what actions,
if any, the board should take regarding the problems within
the Geronimo PMC. The general consensus was that a change
of PMC chair was likely required. There was discussion on
who should make the selection, and, assuming it was the
board's decision, who the board would appoint. Candidates
and their appearances of conflicts-of-interest were
noted and discussed. Methods of "empowering" the PMC
were also discussed.
B. Budget
https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/foundation/Finances/2005-budget.txt
The general consensus was that the focus should be on
the creation of a good, solid 2006 budget, that could
be authorized in January 2006.
C. Retain counsel to review our 501(c)3 legal status
Justin was to draft and submit a Letter Of Engagement to
SFLC (NOTE: Need correct contact here). It was noted that
all work was to be pro bono.
At the Board IRC meeting, it was noted that the board requires a better, more efficient way, to track tasks to closure. The updating of STATUS and the listing of Action Items was one solution that the board has approved. It was agreed that all Action Items should be classified as "lazy consensus" unless specifically noted otherwise.
A. Proposed 2.0 license and related CLA, software grant changes Roy said that he plans to put up a revised version of the license soon. More public review is required and if we get more serious comments, then we should revise again, otherwise it gets put to a vote. Greg brought up the "the PHP thing". Greg volunteers to communicate with PHP about new ASF license and software-grant, to get to closure on this issue.
A. Brian was waiting for a check for Net Express for the new server he is awaiting delivery for. Jim reported that Chuck was to be sending a check to Jim for him to co-sign. As soon as received, Jim reported that he would sign the check and FedEx it to Brian.
A. STV instead of FPP for members meeting votes Tabled until further action by Ben Laurie.
A. STV instead of FPP for members meeting votes Ben Laurie proposed this. It was generally agreed that STV was the preferred mechanism. Ben was tasked with informing members of the benefits of STV and getting/coordinating feedback from them. Executive summary: each voter lists all the people they want to see elected in order of preference. Excess votes for people who have already reached their quota (i.e. enough votes to ensure election) and also for the candidate with the least votes are redistributed to lower-numbered choices. Process is repeated until the required number are elected. http://www.electoral-reform.org.uk/votingsystems/stvi.htm
A. Sam Ruby was asked about his discussions with the PHP Group. He reported that he has been busy with other ASF activities, so he has not made any progress on this item yet.
A. STV instead of FPP for members meeting votes
Tabled.
B. PeerMetrics proposal for a project based on Rabbit (P2P)
It was noted that the newly formed Incubator Project would
handle this.
C. Sam Ruby was designated to take the action item for talking with
Rasmus and the PHP project about the relationship between the
ASF and the PHP Group. Sam noted that the PHP Group had
already been discussing this very issue. Jim noted that, at
the lowest core, any ASF project must be under the Apache License
and that the ASF must have copyright of the code.
A) STV instead of FPP for members meeting votes
Ben Laurie was tasked with bringing the matter up to members
to obtain their comments and feedback.
Executive summary: each voter lists all the people they want to see
elected in order of preference. Excess votes for people who have
already reached their quota (i.e. enough votes to ensure election)
and also for the candidate with the least votes are redistributed
to lower-numbered choices. Process is repeated until the required
number are elected.
http://www.electoral-reform.org.uk/votingsystems/stvi.htm
B) PeerMetrics proposal for a project based on Rabbit (P2P)
Ken volunteered to research and provide information for the next
board meeting.
Message-Id: <20020528165522.F18518@Lithium.MeepZor.Com>
forwarded from May 22, "Tim Motika" <tim@peermetrics.com>
A. Election of Officers
1) Chairman
nominees: Roy Fielding, Greg Stein
By majority vote, Greg Stein was elected as Chairmain.
2) President
nominees: Brian Behlendorf, Dirk-Willem van Gulik
By majority vote, Dirk-Willem van Gulik was elected as President.
3) Treasurer
nominees: Ken Coar, Randy Terbush
By majority vote, Randy Terbush was (re)elected as Treasurer.
4) Exec. V.P. and Secretary
nominees: Jim Jagielski
By unanimous vote, Jim Jagielski was (re)elected as Exec. V.P./
Secretary
Therefore, the new officers for the ASF consist of:
Greg Stein: Chairman
Dirk-Willem van Gulik: President
Randy Terbush: Treasurer
Jim Jagielski: Exec. V.P./Secretary
Randy volunteered to investigate the procedure required to provide
the new officers with signatory authority on the ASF bank account.
Jim volunteered to investigate the procedure required to inform
CSC of the change in officers.
B) STV instead of FPP for members meeting votes
Executive summary: each voter lists all the people they want to see
elected in order of preference. Excess votes for people who have
already reached their quota (i.e. enough votes to ensure election)
and also for the candidate with the least votes are redistributed
to lower-numbered choices. Process is repeated until the required
number are elected. See:
http://www.electoral-reform.org.uk/votingsystems/stvi.htm
There was much discussion over the relative "fairness" of STV over
FPP, and whether such a chance would require approval from the
members as well as a change in the bylaws. It was pointed out that
the present voting scheme could be interpreted as not completely
within the scope of the bylaws itself. The general consensus was that
STV was most likely the correct scheme to be used and the board
voted unanimously to proceed with the use of STV. Ben Laurie
volunteered to further investigate the impact of switching to STV.
C) PeerMetrics proposal for a project based on Rabbit (P2P)
Message-Id: <20020528165522.F18518@Lithium.MeepZor.Com>
forwarded from May 22, "Tim Motika" <tim@peermetrics.com>
Ken volunteered to provide further information regarding this
business as required, as well as follow-up on the proposal.
A. Chuck Murcko proposes that the bylaws be changed to make the board membership a rotating three-year term (1/3 of the board would be elected each year). He proposes to implement this by electing the next board and then having the new board members draw straws to see who serves 1, 2, or 3 year initial terms. From then on, newly elected board members would serve 3 year terms. We would still have a board election (again, for 1/3 of the board members) each year. This was further discussed, and a formal Bylaw ammendment is being formulated by Chuck.
A. Java Community Process Chuck and Jason updated the board on the disagreement with Sun over the JSPA and JCP. They informed the board of their disatisfaction, along with others, with the current proposed agreement and that a community ballot is scheduled for the first week of March. Possible long-term options and paths were also discussed, such as new reference implementations. B. ASF License 2.0 There was some update on discussions within the licensing mailing list. In general, little progress had been made on the effort, but they are progressing.
A. ASF License 2.0 Roy has made some changes to his suggested License, and received some additional feedback from Drew. Further discussion will be held at the next meeting.
A. Request from IBM to make a BSF project within Jakarta. [Bill]
A) ASF virtual office
Roy wants to be able to distribute access to the ASF corporate records
and business accounts, including basic things like a shipping account
and a teleconferencing account. We need to have a low-barrier access
to setting up organizational meetings, whether that be in the form of
on-line access to the office or designating a specific office person
who will be responsible for setting these things up for us [responsible
as in they can place orders and coordinate minor things without having
to jump through hoops].
It was agreed that Roy will investigate this via a contact in Oracle,
regarding their Oracle Small Business offering:
<http://www.oraclesmallbusiness.com/>
B) Contributor logos
It was discussed that some sort of "Apache contributor" or "Apache
sponsor" logo would be an easy way to improve recognition for the
companies that pay salaries or donate money to Apache projects. Having
tiers of such sponsorship was also discussed, as was the control
issue, and having corresponding information on www.apache.org for
those logos. Roy will post an announcement about this mini-project
on the members mailing list.
C) ASF License
The board discussed various issues regarding copyright and patents
and the work of the licensing committee. Several groups want the ASF
to address contribution and use of patented software in contributors
agreement and/or copyright license, while others wish the ASF would
solve the FSF's claim of our license's incompatibility with the GPL.
We have a set of goals in foundation/Licenses, but no sense of
direction or ownership. Ben Laurie volunteered to head this effort.
A) ASF virtual office Tabled due to lack of quorum.
A. Amending the bylaws to prevent a situation where more than half
of the board of directors consisted of employees/owners of the
same company. This was tabled due to time constraints.
B. ASF License. It was agreed that the Licensing List has been
relatively quiet lately. Ken has agreed to "reboot" the list
and re-submit the charter to the list as well. Brian will
continue his "personal" discussions with RMS regarding licensing
issues as well, with respect to the GPL.
A. Reestablishing the Jakarta PMC
=========== R1: Sam Ruby [w/Roy's edits] ============
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests
of the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to
establish a Project Management Committee charged with the creation
and maintenance of commercial-quality, open-source, server-side
software solutions for the Java Platform, for distribution at no
charge to the public.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Project Management
Committee known as the "Jakarta Project Management Committee",
be and hereby is reestablished pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation;
and be it further
RESOLVED, that the Jakarta Project Management Committee be and
hereby is responsible for the creation and maintenance of
commercial-quality, open-source, server-side solutions for the Java
Platform based on software licensed to the Foundation; and be it
further
RESOLVED, that the person holding the office of "Vice President,
Jakarta" shall continue to serve at the direction of the Board of
Directors as the chairman of the Jakarta Project Management
Committee, and to have primary responsibility for management of the
projects within the scope of responsibility of the Jakarta Project
Management Committee; and be it further
RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby
are appointed to serve as members of the Jakarta Project Management
Committee.
James Duncan Davidson <duncan@apache.org>
Peter Donald <donaldp@apache.org>
Pier Paolo Fumagalli <pier@apache.org>
Diane Holt <holtdl@apache.org>
Ted Husted <husted@apache.org>
Ceki Gülcü <ceki@apache.org>
Geir Magnusson Jr. <geirm@apache.org>
Craig McClanahan <craigmcc@apache.org>
Sam Ruby <rubys@apache.org>
Daniel F. Savarese <dfs@apache.org>
Jon Stevens <jon@apache.org>
Jason van Zyl <jvanzyl@apache.org>
=====================================
Resolution R1 passes by unanimous consent.
B. Reestablishing the XML PMC
=========== R2: Roy/Dirk ============
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests
of the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to
establish a Project Management Committee charged with the creation
and maintenance of commercial-quality open-source software related
to XML, for distribution at no charge to the public.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Project Management
Committee known as the "XML Project Management Committee",
be and hereby is reestablished pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation;
and be it further
RESOLVED, that the XML Project Management Committee be and
hereby is responsible for the creation and maintenance of
commercial-quality open-source software related to XML, based
on software licensed to the Foundation; and be it further
RESOLVED, that the person holding the office of "Vice President,
XML" shall continue to serve at the direction of the Board of
Directors as the chairman of the XML Project Management
Committee, and to have primary responsibility for management of the
projects within the scope of responsibility of the XML Project
Management Committee; and be it further
RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby
are appointed to serve as members of the XML Project Management
Committee.
Scott Boag
Ted Leung
Sam Ruby
Davanum Srinivas
Dirk-Willem van Gulik
=====================================
With the modification of the addition of a comma (",") 3rd paragraph,
3rd line, after the words "related to XML", Resolution R2 passes by
unanimous consent.
C. Status of relationship with Cooley Godward LLP
C1. Agreement and contact info
C2. Plan for registering Apache trademarks
C3. Plan for engagement regarding ASF license revision
C4. Plan for engagement regarding employee agreements
Regarding the ASF relationship with Cooley Godward LLP, it was
discussed and agreed that the board needs to give serious consideration
on how to best utilize and control the "use" of their services. One
method would be to have a single "point of contact" at the ASF that
interacts directing with CG LLP, and that CG LLP would only accept
"work" through that contact.
Randy agreed to continue to work the issues with item C2 (trademarks)
whereas Ken agreed to work the issues regarding item C3 (ASF license).
Randy is to "post" a list of CG LLP contacts to the ASF board.
A. Funds for legal review of member employee agreements Ben Hyde has proposed that the Foundation budget funds for legal review of the employee agreements that many of our members are asked to sign as part of their full-time jobs outside the foundation. These agreements impact the foundation because they often stipulate that all of the employee's intellectual property must be assigned to the hiring company by default, along with other egregious clauses. Roy emphasized that this would only be legitimate use of our funds if the review was requested by the Foundation and the results of that review published to all members, since otherwise we would be covering what would normally be a personal expense. Further discussion of this item was tabled until after we have established a relationship with Cooley, at which time the process (and typical cost to the ASF) for doing this type of review can be more accurately determined.
A. Modifications to Trademark Assignment agreement
WHEREAS, The Apache Software Foundation desires that trademarks
used in conjunction with the Apache open-source software projects
be formally transferred from their individual owners to the Foundation.
Now, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the trademark assignment form
attached hereto as Exhibit I is approved for use by members wishing
to transfer ownership of any trademarks to the Foundation.
APPROVED BY FORMAL VOTE:
Yea: Ken, BenH, Jim, Randy, Dirk, Roy
Nay: none
Abstain: none
Absent: Brian, BenL, Sameer
B. Project Management Committees
1) should the PMC report directly to the board
2) should the PMC consist entirely of ASF members
3) should the PMC chairperson be an ASF member
4) should the PMC composition be set by the board or delegated
to the project after the initial PMC creation
5) should the appointment of the PMC chairperson be restricted to
candidates proposed by the project
It was agreed that these discussions would be best held at the
member's meeting and so was tabled until then.
C. Initial Foundation Budget
Randy proposed to create a preliminary budget for the ASF. It
was noted that our fiscal year ends April 30.